Skip to content
Important: This site presents data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). A report does not mean the drug caused the event. Full disclaimer.

Does UPADACITINIB Cause Bacterial infection? 131 Reports in FDA Database

Grow Your Own Natural Pharmacy at Home

Medicinal Garden Kit — 10 healing herbs, 4,818 seeds + step-by-step guide.

Get the Kit

According to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), 131 reports of Bacterial infection have been filed in association with UPADACITINIB (Rinvoq). This represents 0.2% of all adverse event reports for UPADACITINIB.

131
Reports of Bacterial infection with UPADACITINIB
0.2%
of all UPADACITINIB reports
8
Deaths
79
Hospitalizations

How Dangerous Is Bacterial infection From UPADACITINIB?

Of the 131 reports, 8 (6.1%) resulted in death, 79 (60.3%) required hospitalization, and 3 (2.3%) were considered life-threatening.

Is Bacterial infection Listed in the Official Label?

This adverse event is not currently listed in the official FDA drug label for UPADACITINIB. However, 131 reports have been filed with the FAERS database.

What Other Side Effects Does UPADACITINIB Cause?

Pain (4,444) Arthralgia (3,815) Drug ineffective (3,384) Covid-19 (2,978) Rheumatoid arthritis (2,730) Pain in extremity (2,353) Fatigue (2,153) Fall (2,081) Surgery (2,037) Therapy interrupted (1,741)

What Other Drugs Cause Bacterial infection?

PREDNISONE (796) METHOTREXATE (791) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE (782) ADALIMUMAB (754) DEXAMETHASONE (665) CYTARABINE (612) VINCRISTINE (564) CYCLOSPORINE (555) ETOPOSIDE (536) RITUXIMAB (526)

Which UPADACITINIB Alternatives Have Lower Bacterial infection Risk?

UPADACITINIB vs URAPIDIL UPADACITINIB vs UREA UPADACITINIB vs URIDINE TRIACETATE UPADACITINIB vs UROFOLLITROPIN UPADACITINIB vs URSODIOL

Related Pages

UPADACITINIB Full Profile All Bacterial infection Reports All Drugs Causing Bacterial infection UPADACITINIB Demographics