Does UPADACITINIB Cause Bacterial test positive? 16 Reports in FDA Database
Grow Your Own Natural Pharmacy at Home
Medicinal Garden Kit — 10 healing herbs, 4,818 seeds + step-by-step guide.
According to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), 16 reports of Bacterial test positive have been filed in association with UPADACITINIB (Rinvoq). This represents 0.0% of all adverse event reports for UPADACITINIB.
16
Reports of Bacterial test positive with UPADACITINIB
0.0%
of all UPADACITINIB reports
0
Deaths
9
Hospitalizations
How Dangerous Is Bacterial test positive From UPADACITINIB?
Of the 16 reports, 9 (56.3%) required hospitalization.
Is Bacterial test positive Listed in the Official Label?
This adverse event is not currently listed in the official FDA drug label for UPADACITINIB. However, 16 reports have been filed with the FAERS database.
What Other Side Effects Does UPADACITINIB Cause?
Pain (4,444)
Arthralgia (3,815)
Drug ineffective (3,384)
Covid-19 (2,978)
Rheumatoid arthritis (2,730)
Pain in extremity (2,353)
Fatigue (2,153)
Fall (2,081)
Surgery (2,037)
Therapy interrupted (1,741)
What Other Drugs Cause Bacterial test positive?
INOTERSEN (193)
ALEMTUZUMAB (192)
DEVICE (133)
METHYLPREDNISOLONE (114)
ADALIMUMAB (102)
ACYCLOVIR (54)
OCRELIZUMAB (45)
METHOTREXATE (44)
CYTARABINE (30)
DEXAMETHASONE (29)
Which UPADACITINIB Alternatives Have Lower Bacterial test positive Risk?
UPADACITINIB vs URAPIDIL
UPADACITINIB vs UREA
UPADACITINIB vs URIDINE TRIACETATE
UPADACITINIB vs UROFOLLITROPIN
UPADACITINIB vs URSODIOL